07 March 2006

Dumbed Down Taxes

After the year 1000, the dark age took a turn for the better. European cities, led by Venice, began trading with each other and, through Venice, the Middle East and Asia. The cities developed by importing, creating, and exporting innovations. Early medieval cities were had many disadvantages, but they benefited from subsidiary and fiscal accountability.

  • Subsidiary is the principle that government works best – most responsibly and responsively – when it is closest to the people it serves and the needs it addresses.
  • Fiscal accountability is the principle that institutions collecting and disbursing taxes work most responsibly when they are transparent to those providing the money.

The cities of the Roman Empire has lost these advantages in the desperate years before the collapse, when the imperial treasury extorted from them as much as it could and disbursed the money for schemes and needs according to its own, frequently crazed, priorities.

“… both subsidiary and fiscal accountability of public money have almost disappeared from the modern world, as if a cycle is returning to the Roman imperium, than principles that renewed Western Culture long after Rome’s failure.”

“Today, over almost all the world, major taxes, including those most remunerative and most economically informative, like income taxes based on the ability to pay, or those directly reflecting economic expansion, like sales tax, are collected either by sovereign governments or by their surrogates, provincial governments.”

The chapter continues to talk about how city sources of revenue are frequently inadequate to needs and how “senior” (state, provincial, or federal) governments come to their aid with various grants.

I could continue to discuss this chapter further, but I FINALLY managed to rent a copy of P&P. So I am going to wrap this discussion up.

The problem that the author sees is that tax revenues are largely misused. For instance, a city receives a grant for a light rail system, but all they really need is additional funding (much less than the cost of the light rail) for existing transit systems. Everything falls back to fiscal accountability. If the government spends the tax revenue wisely, then lower (and fewer) taxes would be necessary.

4 comments:

Benjamin Cutler said...

Since your reading the book and I'm not, lets see if I'm coming to the same sorts of conclusions she comes to.

Large, centralized governments with managed economies eventually lead to totalitarianism (communism or fascism). So how does a large centralized government come into being (especially in a free society such as ours)? An overly simplfied overview: Large projects like highway systems, sewer systems, electrical systems, etc. would be impossible without a larger form of government and a tax system to finance said projects. Because these things are good for society and the economy, government is given the power to create these projects, and tax the people to finance said projects. Eventually other powers are given to the government (again all with good intentions) such as a social security system, a welfare system, etc. These require more and more taxes. Soon tax money is mishandled and as a result, more taxes are needed. Government grows (becomes bloated) as more and more programs are added. Government programs give the government more and more power (larger armies, larger police force, etc). This power eventually falls into the wrong hands (some people come to power in the government that are willing to use that power). Now we have a totalitarian government, and we all know how long those last (not very). Of course, I am heavily influenced by Hayek.

Patrick Wellner said...

Your conclusions go a step farther than the book's. I will try to continue this blog tomorrow, since I have now completed my task of watching P&P which I highly recommend to anyone.

Andy said...

Personally, I think that where our government went wrong was after the Civil War, when state's rights were stripped down to almost nothing. Of course an individual state is going to be able to provide better government for its citizens than the federal government.

Benjamin Cutler said...

I agree Andy. A lot of people seem to have the idea that the direction our government is taking is a recent development, when in reality it is just a natural progression of the direction the country took shortly after the Civil War.