Synergy is not spreading across the blogdom (or blog'verse for Firefly fans) fast enough. I have decided to increase the synergistic cobloggeration on my blog. I started by posting my mission statement below the title of my blog (a couple of weeks ago). Now I am going to begin to cobloggerate with blogs not in the daring. hmmm, maybe I should start a new recruiting effort? We'll see... ;)
I decided on this blog topic after reading a blog entry by a Ms. Kim of Olathe. I found this particular blog from a link buried in the the Chronicles of the Nameless... read them, they definitely contain blog-worthy material.
And on to the the blog entry:

Some reviews make it out like the album is more pop than country... I would disagree. I have listened to it and it isn't anymore pop than Shania Twain. The country stations never seemed to have a problem playing Shania's music. I admit, I can not think of a particular country albulm/artist to compare with the new Dixie Chicks album though. Musically, it is much darker than most country albums. But I would still consider it country music.
Upcoming Topics:
Calico Jack, Mary Read, and Ann Bonny
Defeat of the Wendigo (even though, I have to defeat him first)
And many others!
2 comments:
If simultaneously liking country music and not liking G. Bush is wrong, then I don't wanna be right.
The whole situation kind of reminds me of the Mohammed cartoons. So, do we have to censor people based on their political opinions now?
Actually, I don't get the whole deal. No one is talking about censoring Green Day, who have released some anti-Bush policy material.
I wonder what would happen if some alternative rock band released some pro-Bush material. Would the radio stations refuse to play them?
Do you have to be anti-Bush to be alternative rock and pro-Bush to be country? The whole thing seems ridiculous.
Post a Comment